The
agricultural sector in Nigeria plays a vital role in the country’s
socio-economic development, serving as a major employer of labour. It is
characterized by a small number of large-scale, modern multinational food
enterprises alongside numerous small-scale operators who often lack the
resources to adopt and implement global best practices in food safety and
standards. The majority of Nigeria’s rural population engage in smallholder
farming, artisanal food processing, and other informal non-farm activities that
form the backbone of the rural economy, with smallholder farmers responsible
for producing about 70% of the nation’s food supply[1].
This informal food sector and its associated
activities play a vital role in providing affordable and accessible food,
especially for low-income populations in many low- and middle-income countries
(LMICs). However, it also poses major food safety challenges due to exposure to
hazards, limited awareness, inadequate infrastructure, and weak regulatory
oversight. As a result, informal markets are significant sources of foodborne
diseases[2].
To improve public health and economic stability (via
enhancing competitiveness of Nigerian food products in local, regional, and
global markets), the Federal Government of Nigeria, launched the National
Policy on Food Safety and Its Implementation Strategy (NPFSIS) in 2015. Developed
by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (FMoHSW) and partners, it was reviewed, updated
in 2023 and launched on World Food Safety Day 7 June 2024, as National Policy
on Food Safety and Quality and Its Implementation Plan (NPFSQIP). This updated
policy establishes a coordinated, risk-based, and One Health–aligned approach
to food safety, emphasizing effective institutional collaboration and
compliance with global best practices. It also acknowledges the vital role of
both formal and informal food sectors, including street food vendors,
traditional markets, and small-scale processors, as key contributors to food
security, employment generation, and public health protection in Nigeria.
The Food Safety and Quality Bill (2019) was drafted and
endorsed by stakeholders as a comprehensive legislative framework to harmonize
regulatory functions under a single national food safety law. The bill was
approved by the government and transmitted to the National Assembly (NASS) for
legislative action in January 2019 and was officially given its first reading
on 11th of July 2019. However, it’s legislative processes is yet to
be accented to by Mr. President. When passed into law, it will provide the
required legal framework.
Nigeria currently operates a multiple agency food safety
system with responsibilities split across seven national agencies that focus on
different sectors, such as Health, Agriculture, Food Industry, Environment and
Trade, as well as State and Local governments.
Core regulatory and standard-setting institutions:
Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (FMoHSW): The Ministry derives its legal
mandate in food safety under the Constitution and various laws such as the
National Health Act 2014, the Food and Drug Act 1974, and others implementing
these acts through the design of policies, programs, and strategies on food
safety at all stages of the food supply chain including water and chemical
safety. It also provides overall leadership on food safety policy, public
health protection, and coordination of inter-ministerial food safety
activities. Presently, the Ministry chairs the National Food Safety Management
Committee (NFSMC) and on a rotational basis, chairs the National Codex
Committee (NCC) with the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security. The
regulatory/implementation arms of the Ministry whose roles and responsibilities
related to food safety include:
The
regulatory/implementing arm of the Ministry concerning food safety includes:
The regulatory/implementing arm of
the Ministry concerning food safety includes:
Regulatory Divisions Under NAQ
Beyond the core regulatory
agencies directly responsible for food safety control and enforcement, several
other ministries, departments, and agencies (MDAs) contribute technical expertise,
consumer protection, public health surveillance, research support, and trade
facilitation functions that indirectly enhance food safety systems in Nigeria.
These supporting institutions
include:
Coordination and Decentralized Implementation
The National Food Safety and Quality Policy
(2023) established a three-tier coordination mechanism:
This decentralized approach aims to extend
oversight across the food chain and improve responsiveness to local challenges.
However, operational capacity varies across states and LGAs due to funding
constraints, limited infrastructure, and uneven political commitment.
However, in
practice, coordination amongst these regulatory bodies is weak. Lines of
communication between federal, state, and local institutions are often informal
and fragmented and data on inspections, foodborne diseases, and enforcement
actions are rarely shared systematically, making national monitoring difficult[4]. Awareness of the NPFSIS among actors
at State and Local Government levels that interface with the informal food
sector also seems to be highly limited. Consequently, the NPFSIS document needs
to be adapted at the State and Local Government Area Council levels to enable
effective implementation and achievement of its set goals and objectives across
the informal food sector as well[5].
Some of
the major challenges faced in the food safety sector include:
1. Overlapping
mandates and fragmented governance:
The presence of numerous MDAs with
partially duplicated mandates leads to confusion about leadership and
accountability. For example, NAFDAC and SON sometimes issue overlapping food
quality regulations, while state health departments run parallel inspection
systems. The NPFSQIP identifies this as one of the most critical barriers to
cohesive food safety management. To address these challenges, the new policy, NPFSQIP, introduces a unified and integrated Food Safety
and Quality Bill to be adopted across all tiers of government.
It also mandates the modernization
of existing regulations and institutions in line with international standards,
enforces stricter penalties for repeated non-compliance, and promotes synergy
among national, state, and local authorities for more effective coordination of
food safety efforts.
2. Weak subnational
capacity:
Local governments, the front line of
enforcement, often lack adequate resources, vehicles, testing equipment, and
skilled inspectors. EHOs are overstretched, and training is inconsistent across
states. Many rely solely on visual assessments due to the absence of
laboratories or portable testing kits.
3. Limited
infrastructure for safe food handling:
Traditional markets and street
vending areas often lack potable water, cold storage, or waste disposal
facilities, making compliance with hygiene regulations difficult. Poor
infrastructure undermines even well-designed regulatory policies.
4. Outdated and
fragmented legislation:
While some instruments, such as
NAFDAC’s Food Hygiene
Regulations (2025), reflect modernization, others date back to colonial-era or early post-independence
public health laws that are not aligned with modern risk-based approaches or
Codex standards.
5. Low awareness and
compliance in the informal sector:
A large proportion of street food
vendors and small-scale handlers operate without registration or knowledge of
safety standards. Economic constraints and informal business models make
compliance less of a priority compared to daily survival.
6. Poor inter-agency
coordination and data management:
The lack of a unified food safety information system prevents data-driven
decision-making. Agencies maintain separate records and rarely exchange
surveillance data or inspection outcomes.
7. Uneven political
commitment and enforcement across states:
Some states, such as Lagos and Ogun,
have dedicated food safety units and market sanitation programs, while others
lack any structured system, creating geographical inequities in consumer
protection.
Nigeria’s food safety governance framework is
severely constrained by fragmentation,
weak subnational capacity, and limited coordination. Strengthening the system requires:
With
these reforms, Nigeria can move toward a more coherent, risk-based, and
inclusive food safety system that protects public health while supporting
livelihoods within its dynamic informal food economy.
Sources:
Matthew, A. O., Abraham, T. W., & Adeyemi, A. A. (2015). Rural
poverty and agricultural development in Nigeria: Issues and prospects. Journal
of Agricultural Economics, Environment and Social Sciences, 1(1), 58–66.
[2]
Jaffee, S., & Henson, S. (2018). Promoting food safety in the
informal markets of low- and middle-income countries: The need for a rethink.
University of Maryland and University of Guelph.
[4]
Obadina, A. O. (2024, November 1). Review of policies related to food
safety in Nigeria: Challenges and opportunities. Food Security Group,
Michigan State University. Retrieved from https://www.canr.msu.edu/resources/review-of-policies-related-to-food-safety-in-nigeria-challenges-and-opportunities
[5] Swartz, H.,
Okoruwa, A., & de Vries, A. (2022). Food Safety in Nigeria: Policy Brief
[Advocacy and policy document]. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN). https://www.gainhealth.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/Food%20Safety%20in%20Nigeria%20Policy%20Brief.pdf